Visa & Permanent Residence Litigation Services IN SOUTH AFRICA

When visa or permanent residence applications are delayed by the Department of Home Affairs (DHA), and all escalation attempts have failed, High Court litigation can be the most effective solution. Judicial intervention compels DHA to meet its legal obligations, providing a structured pathway that ensures compliance with South African immigration laws and protects applicants’ rights.

Our team at Visa Litigation Services South Africa specialises in visa litigation, including mandamus orders and urgent legal interventions, helping clients achieve outcomes for visa, permanent residence, and citizenship applications.

Get In Touch

Our Litigation Process

1. Case Assessment and Pre-Litigation Strategy

The first step is a detailed review of your application to ensure all administrative remedies have been exhausted:

  • Verify documentation and statutory timeframes
  • Compile evidence of DHA communication delays or errors
  • Assess procedural non-compliance or unreasonable delays
  • Build a strong legal foundation for potential High Court action

Once internal remedies are exhausted, we prepare a formal High Court application to compel DHA to process your application within a defined timeframe (typically 10–30 business days).

2. What the Court Application Includes

Our High Court application is strategically structured to increase the likelihood of rapid adjudication:

  • Statutory Provisions: Citing immigration laws, DHA regulations, and internal directives requiring timely processing
  • Relevant Case Law: Referencing precedents where courts compelled DHA to act due to unreasonable delays
  • Documentary Evidence: Complete record of correspondence demonstrating DHA’s failure to respond appropriately
  • Filing and Service: Application filed in the High Court of South Africa and formally served on DHA and its legal representatives

3. Legal Engagement and Negotiation

After serving the application, our legal team engages with the State Attorney representing DHA to seek an expedited resolution. Often, this results in a commitment from DHA to process the delayed application. If no response is forthcoming, we proceed to the High Court hearing.

4. Judicial Argument and Court Order

During the hearing, we present evidence of unreasonable delays and DHA’s failure to adjudicate. The court may issue a binding order:

  • Compelling DHA to process the application within a strict timeline
  • Awarding additional remedies or penalties for significant administrative inefficiencies

5. Ensuring Legal Transparency and Client Communication

Throughout litigation, we maintain full transparency, providing:

  • Regular case updates
  • Summaries of DHA or court developments
  • Clear guidance to minimise stress during proceedings

6. Enforcing Compliance and Achieving Resolution

We help applicants enforce their rights through judicial intervention, reducing delays, cutting costs, and improving the chance of success. If follow-ups fail, our legal team initiates court action to ensure your application is processed within a defined timeframe.

Frequently Asked Questions

Litigation is suitable when all administrative remedies have been exhausted, and DHA fails to decide within a reasonable time.

Courts assess on a case-by-case basis; delays over 180 days are often considered unreasonable.

DHA may be compelled to decide within a set timeframe, issue a declaratory order, award costs, or enforce compliance.

Filing to judgment can take weeks to a few months, depending on urgency and backlog.

Yes, but further court action (contempt or judicial oversight) can enforce compliance.

Yes, all administrative remedies must generally be exhausted before High Court action.

Litigation can be more expensive than appeals, but successful applicants may recover costs from DHA.

Courts may waive delays if there is a reasonable explanation and the merits favour the applicant.

Yes, cases posing irreparable harm (e.g., deportation risk) can be structured as urgent.

No, but strong evidence and legal foundation significantly increase the likelihood of compelling DHA action.

Take Action Today

If your visa or permanent residence application has been delayed despite persistent follow-ups, judicial intervention can provide a timely solution. Our experienced team specialises in using High Court action to compel DHA to act within a reasonable period.

Contact Us

Scroll to Top
Professional black and white headshot of John Paul, a man with dark hair and beard, wearing a suit and striped tie.

John-Paul Fraser

Tax Attorney, Admitted Attorney, BCom (Law), LLB at TAX CONSULTING SOUTH AFRICA

John-Paul is employed at Tax Consulting South Africa and is an Admitted Attorney of the High Court of South Africa, having completed his BCom Law Degree LLB Degree. He is in the process of completing his Masters in Business Administration (MBA) through the University of Suffolk in England. John-Paul specialises in cross-border taxation and has found a passion in the technicalities and relief offered under the international legal framework ensuring that tax treatment of income and assets are correctly allocated to the relevant tax jurisdictions.

Black and white headshot of Keri Culver smiling broadly, wearing glasses and a button-down shirt.

Keri Culver

Senior Immigration Consultant at Xpatweb

Keri has dedicated the past eight years to the immigration industry, gaining extensive experience in Canadian, South African, Australian, EU, UK, African, and Mauritian visa processes. She manages a large corporate client portfolio, ensuring tailored solutions for businesses and individuals alike. Her comprehensive knowledge, combined with her extensive travels, enables her to provide personalised and effective immigration strategies to clients worldwide. Keri takes pride in delivering exceptional client service, ensuring every individual’s journey through immigration is smooth and efficient.